What occupations can be characterized as falling within the humanities? The answer
to this question is by no means self-evident, especially given that the occupations
that draw on and further the humanities are even more varied than the disciplines
within the academic field. Nonetheless, some parameters can be set, and, for the
purposes of the Humanities Indicators Project, these are broad. Not only do they
include occupations that are obviously humanistic in their orientation—writing or
teaching history, for example—and that clearly depend on humanistic skills—such
as editing books. They also attempt to take into account the myriad occupations,
such as those of audiovisual media specialists, that both owe their existence to
humanistic institutions and enterprises and support them. At the same time, however,
the occupations under consideration in this section of the Humanities Indicators
exclude civil servants who administer federal, state, and local government humanities
programs because these individuals cannot be identified using the occupational classification
system employed by the
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
(BLS), which is the primary source of employment data in the United States and the
source of the information on which the indicators in this section are based.
Moreover, although a comprehensive statistical description of the humanities workforce
should include both those who work on a volunteer basis—literacy tutors are
just one example—and those who are self-employed—as are many writers,
for instance—existing data do not permit calculations of the proportion of
these types of workers in the humanities workforce to be made. Thus, the first indicator
in this section, which concerns the size and composition of this workforce, considers
only those workers who are accounted for on the payrolls of U.S. employers and are
therefore included in the BLS’s surveys. The challenges of determining their earnings
are addressed in the other indicators presented here.
|
Indicator III-1
|
Size and Occupational Distribution of the Humanities Workforce
|
|
|
See the Note on Employment
Data and the Note
on the Use of Bureau of Labor Statistics Employment Data.
Most of the employment data presented in this indicator are based on information
gathered by the
Occupational Employment Statistics (OES) Program
of the BLS. These data concern only the early 21st century because changes made
in 1999 to the occupational classification system used by the BLS make it difficult
to draw comparisons with earlier periods and identify historic trends. These data
do, however, offer a perspective on the occupational characteristics of the humanities
workforce in the contemporary United States (for more on the advantages and disadvantages
associated with the use of various federal sources to estimate the extent of humanities-related
employment, see Note
on the Use of Bureau of Labor Statistics Employment Data).
For the purposes of this indicator, the humanities workforce encompasses primary,
secondary, and postsecondary humanities faculty; other professionals who work in
fields that are not only dedicated to the humanities but also related to them; and
support staff employed in a variety of humanistic institutions. Although a comprehensive
assessment of the humanities workforce should also include a variety of other types
of occupations (such as those done on a volunteer basis) and workers (such as those
who are self-employed), data on them are not currently available (see the introduction
to this section,
Employment in Humanistic Occupations and Settings, and the
Note on Employment Data for an explanation of these data limitations). Consequently,
although the humanities workforce is broadly conceived, the count provided below
still underestimates—probably quite substantially—its true size.
In addition, the BLS data do not measure the size of the humanities workforce directly.
These data are not collected from individual workers but from firms that are asked
to report the number of people they employ. Thus, the figures cited below should
be understood as counts of jobs not workers (some of whom may have more than one
job; see the Note
on Employment Data).
These BLS data, which are supplemented here with data from
the
National Center for Education Statistics
(NCES), indicate that jobs in humanistic occupations and settings amounted to approximately
2.53 million, or 2% of all employment in the early 2000s.1 This figure can be
broken down further, according to occupational types for which BLS data are available.
Depicted in Figure III-1, the occupational categories are described more
fully below, where both job counts and proportions of total humanities employment
are also given.
Faculty Positions in Primary and Secondary Schools (37% of total humanities employment)
According to the BLS, in 2002 the nation’s schools had 3,733,340 jobs filled by
elementary, middle, and high school teachers. Additional information obtained from
the NCES’
Schools and Staffing Survey
(SASS), which includes data on the fields of instruction for all the teachers it
surveys, makes it possible to estimate that 925,868 of these jobs were in the humanities.
In the 1999–2000 SASS administration, 24.8% of all teachers gave their specialization
as being within a humanities discipline. While those reporting their field to be
“social studies and history” are counted here as teaching humanities, the humanities
share of jobs would be substantially greater if the “general” educators who spent
a portion of their time teaching English, history, or language skills were included
(37% of all teachers described themselves as such). For more data on the characteristics
of humanities educators at the primary and secondary levels, see Part I, Section
C of the Indicators,
Primary and Secondary Faculty.
Faculty Positions in Postsecondary Institutions (4% of total humanities employment)
According to the BLS, there were 1,113,200 postsecondary teaching jobs in the United
States in 2002. Of these, 112,900, or about 10%, were in the humanities. This figure,
which is for both full- and part-time employment, includes 109,800 positions in
the nation’s colleges and universities, as well as several thousand in other institutional
settings, such as business firms and government agencies. (For data concerning full-
and part-time positions, see Indicator III-11,
Traditional versus Nontraditional Humanities Faculty.)
|
Note: The total employment estimate for postsecondary humanities teaching
was arrived at by adding the employment estimates for the humanities disciplines
included in the BLS’s surveys—namely, English language and literature, foreign
languages and literatures, history, area/cultural/ethnic studies, philosophy, and
religion. Another BLS disciplinary category, arts, drama, and music, could not be
considered for this indicator because the nature of the data makes it impossible
to distinguish faculty positions in humanistic disciplines such as art history from
those in the studio and performing arts.
|
|
Employment in Humanities Professions (14% of total humanities employment)
Because some of the professional occupations in the humanities can overlap (e.g.,
those of historians and curators, or of writers and historians) and because employers
determine how jobs are designated on the BLS survey, data are not definitive. Nonetheless,
the BLS does include employment figures for a variety of professional humanistic
occupations, which are designated as follows:
|
Librarians 156,920
|
|
Editors (textual, in both humanistic and nonhumanistic institutions and enterprises)
106,520
|
|
Writers/Authors (not including technical writers; journalists are tallied in the
section on the Newspaper, Periodical, Book, and Directory Publishing category, below)
41,990
|
|
Archivists, Curators, and Museum Technicians 20,100
|
|
Interpreters and Translators 18,600
|
|
Historians 2,110
|
Together these occupations encompassed 346,240 positions in 2002.
Employment in Humanities-Related Professions (2% of total humanities employment)
Other professions, although not squarely within the humanities, are sufficiently
related in terms of the content of their work or the purposes their work serves
to merit inclusion here. The occupations that fall into this category and are covered
by the BLS survey are those of:
|
News Analysts, Reporters, and Correspondents (including those working in broadcast
media but excluding those working for newspapers and periodicals, whose jobs are
accounted for in the Newspaper, Periodical, Book, and Directory Publishing category,
below) 22,010
|
|
Tour Guides (apart from those whose jobs are in museums; the latter are included
in the Museum Staff segment of the Employment in Humanities Institutions category,
below) 18,810
|
|
Audiovisual Collections Specialists (who prepare, plan, and operate audiovisual
teaching aids for use in education, or who record, catalog, and file audiovisual
materials in libraries and museums, as well as a variety of other institutions and
enterprises) 9,040
|
Altogether, these humanities-related professions included 49,860 positions in 2002.
Employment in Humanities Institutions (18% of total humanities employment)
The jobs described here, which involve supporting humanities faculty and professionals,
are performed in a variety of institutional settings. The filled positions noted
in the BLS survey for 2002 amounted to approximately 460,000 and consisted of jobs
performed by the following:
|
Library Personnel (who perform technical, administrative, and building maintenance
functions in academic and public libraries) 258,683
|
|
|
Note: This figure was calculated by the
American Library Association
using data from the National Center for Education Statistics; it does not include
job counts for employment in libraries associated with the federal government, industry,
or not-for-profit organizations, for which data do not currently exist.
|
|
|
Museum Staff (including 3,130 jobs performed by general and operations managers;
7,140 by cashiers; 1,400 by public relations specialists; 6,690 by security guards;
9,760 by tour guides; and many more by a variety of other staff) 100,800.
|
|
|
College and University Staff (including those whose jobs are in administration,
technical support, food service, and maintenance) 102,264
|
|
|
Note: Although the BLS does report detailed occupational statistics for colleges
and universities, these data cannot readily be disaggregated by academic discipline.
Consequently, arriving at an estimate of the proportion of college and university
support staff whose employment is attributable to the existence of humanities departments
on the nation’s college and university campuses is difficult. Nonetheless, the job
count cited here can provide a useful starting point for thinking about the extent
of nonfaculty employment generated by the humanities.
According to BLS data, America’s colleges and universities employed 3,204,910 persons
in 2002. Of these, 1.16 million were employed in general university-wide areas such
as administration, food service, computer network support, security, and construction.
The percentage of these 1.16 million jobs that can be attributed to the humanities
can be assumed to be commensurate with the humanities’ share of total academic activity.
This percentage is not precisely calculable, but it is known that the humanities
currently account for approximately 14% of all faculty (see Indicator III-9, Number of Humanities Faculty)
and 12% of all bachelor’s degrees in American universities (see Indicator II-1,
Undergraduate
Degrees in the Humanities). Even though they account for a significantly smaller
percentage of the dollars coming into large universities than do the sciences and
engineering, which receive the overwhelming proportion of government research funding
(see Indicator IV-10,
Research and Development Expenditures at Colleges and Universities), it seems
unlikely that the humanities account for anything less than 5% of support jobs,
or 160,246 positions. Factoring out those humanities professionals counted elsewhere
(nonfaculty historians, librarians, other library staff, and archivists/curators—included
above under “Humanities Professions”; audiovisual collections specialists and news
analysts/reporters/correspondents—discussed above under “Humanities-Related Professions”)
leaves 102,264 jobs in academic institutions that rely on and support the humanities.
|
|
Employment in Newspaper, Book, Periodical, and Directory Publishing (25% of total
humanities employment)
Although eliminating employment generated by directory publishing would be desirable,
the way in which employment data are collected by the BLS does not make it possible
to estimate employment levels for newspaper, periodical, and book publishing alone.
Thus, the figure for the entire industry in 2002 was 705,540 jobs. Subtracting those
jobs tallied in Employment in Humanities Professions and in Employment in Humanities-Related
Professions, above, leaves 630,290 positions in publishing that are related to the
humanities. This figure includes the 39,090 jobs performed by news analysts, reporters,
and correspondents working for news periodicals (these jobs together account for
6% of total publishing employment).
Note
1 Total U.S. employment for 2002 was 127,523,760, according to the U.S.
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment Statistics
Program, “Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates: National Cross-Industry Estimates”
(2002),
http://www.bls.gov/oes/oes_dl.htm#2002.
|
Indicator III-2
|
Salaries in Humanistic Occupations
|
|
|
In collecting information on employment levels in the United States, the BLS also
gathers detailed information on annual salaries and hourly wages. The existence
of these data makes it possible, in principle, to construct an index of compensation
of those working in humanistic occupations and settings and to demonstrate how they
are faring relative to other workers within the broader economy. This index remains
under development, however, as Humanities Indicators staff continue to address the
many challenges in constructing it, including changes over time in the BLS classifications
of jobs, determining which occupations to include, and compensating for significant
shifts in the structure of humanistic industries and institutions. This edition
of the Humanities Indicators does, however, include salary data for humanities educators.
See Indicator I-11,
Humanities Teachers’ Salaries and Job Satisfaction, which concerns primary
and secondary school teachers, and Indicator III-14, Faculty Earnings, which provides
details on salaries of full-time postsecondary faculty.
Note on Employment Data
Indicator III-I,
Size and Occupational Distribution of the Humanities Workforce, relies on
employment data collected by the BLS’s Occupational Employment Statistics (OES)
program. According to the OES, employment is the number of workers who can be classified
as full- and part-time employees, including workers on paid vacations or other types
of leave; workers on unpaid short-term absences; salaried officers, executives,
and staff members of incorporated firms; employees temporarily assigned to other
units; and non-contract employees for whom the reporting unit is their permanent
duty station regardless of whether that unit prepares their paychecks.
The OES survey includes all full- and part-time wage and salary workers in non-farm
industries. Self-employed owners, partners in unincorporated firms, household workers,
and unpaid family workers are excluded. (U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor
Statistics, “Appendix B: Survey Method and Reliability Statement for May 2003 Occupational
Employment Statistics Survey,” 227,
http://www.bls.gov/oes/2003/may/appendix_b.pdf)
The OES does not survey individual workers. Rather, it surveys “establishments”—that
is, firms and businesses—concerning the jobs their employees perform. Employment
figures should therefore be understood as job counts. Thus, employment as the BLS
uses the term is not synonymous with workforce—the former will tend to be greater
because some workers may be employed by more than one establishment. This distinction
between jobs and workers is particularly important with regard to postsecondary
faculty employment estimates because a substantial percentage of those teaching
in postsecondary educational institutions are part-time employees (see Indicator
III-11,
Traditional versus Nontraditional Humanities Faculty) and either 1) work another
full or part-time nonacademic job or 2) teach classes at more than one college/university.
Back to Content
|
Note on the Use of Bureau of Labor Statistics Employment Data
The BLS' Occupational Employment Statistics program is not the only source of high-quality
national employment data. The Census "long form" has traditionally included a question
on employment. The long form's replacement, the U.S. Census Bureau's new
American Community Survey
(ACS), also asks respondents to describe the nature of their jobs. (The ACS is designed
to collect the types of data that were generated by the long form, but on a more
regular basis: every 1-5 years, depending on the size of the geographical unit,
rather than once a decade.) Postsecondary faculty employment data are also available
via the
National Survey of College Graduates, which is administered
by the National Science Foundation, and the
National Center for Education Statistics' National Study of Postsecondary Faculty
(for more on these surveys and their value for estimating the number and other characteristics
of postsecondary humanities faculty, see David Laurence's essay, The Humanities Workforce, and
Indicator III-9,
Number of Humanities Faculty).
Employment information was not yet available from the ACS when Humanities Indicator
staff were identifying data that could serve as a basis for this indicator, and
the two alternate sources of post-secondary faculty employment data mentioned above
are collected at 5-10 year intervals. BLS data were thus used as the basis of this
indicator and the indicator describing trends in the amount of postsecondary faculty
employment (see Indicator III-9,
Number of Humanities Faculty), since only they yielded annual estimates
that would enable the Humanities Indicators to closely track change over time in
the size and composition of the humanities workforce. Now that ACS data have been
released, Humanities Indicators staff are assessing the relative merits of the ACS
and OES as sources of data on humanities-related employment. The findings of this
investigation will determine the data source on which any future versions of this
indicator will be based.
Back to Content
|
|